Headquarters
Canada
Stock Exchange Listings
TSX: TECK.A - TSX: TECK.B - NYSE: TECK
Workforce
Employees: 10,452 (31/12/2020)
Contract workers: Not Reported (Not Reported)
Total: Not Reported (Not Reported)
Geographic Footprint
Producing countries: 4
Known tax jurisdictions: 4
Revenues (in BUSD)
Total Revenue: 7.016 (31/12/2020)
Net Income: -0.740154006 (31/12/2020)
State Ownership
China: >10
2019 Fatalities
Total worker fatalities: 1
  • Employees: 0
  • Contract workers: 1
Others: 0
2020 Fatalities
Total worker fatalities: 0
  • Employees: 0
  • Contract workers: 0
Others: 0
Home countries, where the company is headquartered
Producing countries, where the company has mining operations
Mine sites selected for mine-site-level assessment

Summary of Results

Economic DevelopmentBusiness ConductLifecycle ManagementCommunity WellbeingWorking ConditionsEnvironmental Responsibility0%20%40%60%80%100%
  • Teck
  • RMI average
  • Collective Best Score

While absolute results remain low overall, Teck shows one of the two stronger results in Lifecycle Management and one of the five stronger results in Community Wellbeing and Environmental Responsibility. In Lifecycle Management, Teck shows evidence of having systems in place designed to ensure its operations’ closure planning seeks continued livelihood viability for affected communities. The company has made formal commitments on a wide range of issues, including: preventing bribery and corruption, adopting a lifecycle approach, respecting human rights, ensuring safe and healthy working conditions, managing its environmental impacts systematically, and not exploring or mining in World Heritage Sites and respecting other protected areas.

As evidence of Teck’s continuous improvement efforts since the RMI Report 2020, the company’s approach to human rights now commits to respecting human rights defenders, giving Teck one of the two stronger results on the issue, and its new Expectations for Suppliers and Contractors, which include human rights requirements.

Teck is associated with several leading practices, including a living wage review and materials management to optimise recycling of goods used in their operations, with an overall target of zero industrial waste disposal by 2040.

However, Teck’s results in Economic Development are below the average and are limited by a lack of evidence of action on a number of issues, including for example working collaboratively with sub-national governments on socio-economic development planning, and developing procurement opportunities for suppliers at the national levels.

In the mine-site assessment Teck ranks 8th among the 40 companies on its mine-site-level results, with an average score of only 14%. Moreover, none of the seven Teck mine sites show any relevant evidence on four of the fifteen issues covered in the assessment: safety of communities, safety of workers, women workers, and living wage.

Overall results

Economic Development

16.70 / 100.002022
17.00 / 100.002020

Business Conduct

48.50 / 100.002022
47.00 / 100.002020

Lifecycle Management

43.60 / 100.002022
44.00 / 100.002020

Community Wellbeing

31.00 / 100.002022
29.00 / 100.002020

Working Conditions

38.30 / 100.002022
34.00 / 100.002020

Environmental Responsibility

50.20 / 100.002022
49.00 / 100.002020

Average Mine-Site Score

16%2022
2022
17
%
2020
17
%

Economic Development

2022
49
%
2020
47
%

Business Conduct

2022
44
%
2020
44
%

Lifecycle Management

2022
31
%
2020
29
%

Community Wellbeing

2022
38
%
2020
34
%

Working Conditions

2022
50
%
2020
49
%

Environmental Responsibility

2022
16
%

Average Mine-Site Score

Results per measurement area

Commitment

(9 indicators)

Action

(42 indicators)

Effectiveness

(20 indicators)

Results per indicator

Economic Development

Mine-site Results

Mine sites selected for individual assessment (but not included in the overall company score)

Click on a mine site name to open its individual result page
AntaminaCarmen de AndacolloElkviewFording RiverHighland Valley CopperQuebrada BlancaRed Dog
Local Employment
(score /4)
1.01.01.01.01.01.01.0
Local Procurement
(score /4)
1.00.50.50.50.50.50.5
Air Quality
(score /4)
0.00.02.52.50.00.02.5
Water Quality
(score /4)
0.00.03.03.00.00.02.0
Water Quantity
(score /4)
1.01.00.00.00.01.00.0
Rehabilitation and Post-Closure
(score /4)
0.50.50.50.50.00.50.5
Tailings Management
(score /4)
1.03.02.02.02.5-1.5
Safety of Communities
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Community Grievances
(score /4)
1.51.00.00.00.01.00.0
Safety and Health of Workers
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Women Workers
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Workplace Deaths and Injuries
(score /4)
1.50.00.00.00.00.00.0
Training of Workers
(score /4)
1.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Decent Living Wage
(score /4)
0.01.02.02.02.01.01.0
Worker Grievances
(score /4)
1.51.00.50.50.51.00.5
Mine Site Score
(%)
17.015.020.020.011.011.016.0

Operational mine sites

Mine Site NameAliases/Other namesCountryCompany's share (%)ProductsMining types
Antamina-Peru22.5Copper, Zinc, Molybdenum, Lead, Silver, BismuthOpen-pit
Carmen de Andacollo-Chile90Copper, GoldOpen-pit
ElkviewBaldy Ridge, Natal Ridge, Elk ValleyCanada95CoalOpen-pit
Fording RiverElk ValleyCanada100CoalOpen-pit
Fort Hills-Canada21.3Bitumen (Oil Sands)Open-pit
Greenhills OperationsElk ValleyCanada100CoalOpen-pit
Highland Valley CopperHVC, BethlehemCanada100Copper, MolybdenumOpen-pit
Line CreekElk ValleyCanada100CoalOpen-pit
Quebrada Blanca-Chile60CopperOpen-pit
Red Dog-USA100Zinc, Lead, SilverOpen-pit

Closed mine sites (known)
(controlled assets under care & maintenance, closure or post-closure management)

Mine Site NameAliases/Other namesCountryCompany's share (%)ProductsMining typesYear of closure
Apex-USA50Copper, Gallium, GermaniumUnderground1987
Beaverdell-Canada100Silver, GoldUnderground1991
Bluebell-Canada100Lead, Zinc, SilverUnderground1972
Bluebell-Canada100Lead, Zinc, SilverOpen-pit, Underground1972
Bullmoose-Canada60.9CoalOpen-pit2003
Cardinal River-Canada100CoalOpen-pit2020
Coal MountainElk ValleyCanada100CoalOpen-pit2019
Duck Pond-Canada100Copper, ZincOpen-pit, Underground2015
Louvicourt-Canada55Zinc, CopperUnderground2005
Magmont-USA50Lead, ZincUnderground1994
McCracken-USA100Silver, Lead, ZincUnderground1985
Pend Oreille-USA100Zinc, LeadUnderground2019
Polaris-Canada100Zinc, LeadUnderground2002
Quintette-Canada92.6CoalOpen-pit2001
Sa Dena HesMount HundereCanada50Lead, ZincUnderground1992
Sullivan-Canada100Zinc, Lead, SilverUnderground2001

Tax Jurisdictions (known)

Canada

Chile

Peru

USA