Headquarters
Russian Federation
Stock Exchange Listings
HKEX: 486 - MOEX: RUAL
Workforce
Employees: 56,150 (31/12/2020)
Contract workers: Not Reported (Not Reported)
Total: Not Reported (Not Reported)
Geographic Footprint
Producing countries: 5
Known tax jurisdictions: 18
Revenues (in BUSD)
Total Revenue: 8.566 (31/12/2020)
Net Income: 0.759 (31/12/2020)
State Ownership
No State ownership
2019 Fatalities
Total worker fatalities: 7
  • Employees: 4
  • Contract workers: 3
Others: Not Specified
2020 Fatalities
Total worker fatalities: 7
  • Employees: 2
  • Contract workers: 5
Others: Not Specified
Home countries, where the company is headquartered
Producing countries, where the company has mining operations
Mine sites selected for mine-site-level assessment

Summary of Results

Economic DevelopmentBusiness ConductLifecycle ManagementCommunity WellbeingWorking ConditionsEnvironmental Responsibility0%20%40%60%80%100%
  • RUSAL
  • RMI average
  • Collective Best Score

Absolute results are low overall and RUSAL’s results are largely dependent on the commitments it has made, including to prevent bribery and corruption and ensure safe and healthy working conditions.

RUSAL shows a relatively stronger result on the issue of tracking the effectiveness of its whistleblowing mechanism. The company discloses information on the actions taken in response to the concerns raised and shows evidence of having reviewed the effectiveness of this whistleblowing mechanism.

The company shows evidence of improvement since the RMI Report 2022, including by formally committing to respect human rights in compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and by disclosing information on the tax benefits and holidays the company receives.

In the company-wide assessment, RUSAL’s results are above the average in Economic Development and Business Conduct, but below average in Lifecycle Management, Community Wellbeing, Working Conditions and Environmental Responsibility. RUSAL’s overall results are limited by a lack of evidence of action on a number of key issues. For example, the company shows no evidence of supporting local procurement opportunities or of planning for the management of post-closure transition for workers and affected communities.

RUSAL ranks 40th among the 40 companies on its mine-site-level results, with an average mine-site-level score of 0%. The overall results of the seven RUSAL mine sites included in the mine-site assessment are strikingly weak. None of these seven mine sites show any relevant evidence on any of the fifteen issues covered.

Overall results

Economic Development

25.00 / 100.002022
24.00 / 100.002020

Business Conduct

37.10 / 100.002022
31.00 / 100.002020

Lifecycle Management

2.80 / 100.002022
3.00 / 100.002020

Community Wellbeing

6.50 / 100.002022
5.00 / 100.002020

Working Conditions

27.50 / 100.002022
27.00 / 100.002020

Environmental Responsibility

13.80 / 100.002022
16.00 / 100.002020

Average Mine-Site Score

0%2022
2022
25
%
2020
24
%

Economic Development

2022
37
%
2020
31
%

Business Conduct

2022
3
%
2020
3
%

Lifecycle Management

2022
7
%
2020
5
%

Community Wellbeing

2022
28
%
2020
27
%

Working Conditions

2022
14
%
2020
16
%

Environmental Responsibility

2022
0
%

Average Mine-Site Score

Results per measurement area

Commitment

(9 indicators)

Action

(42 indicators)

Effectiveness

(20 indicators)

Results per indicator

Economic Development

Mine-site Results

Mine sites selected for individual assessment (but not included in the overall company score)

Click on a mine site name to open its individual result page
Achinsk AluminaBanicheskyDian-DianKindiaNorth UralsTimanWindalco
Local Employment
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Local Procurement
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Air Quality
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Water Quality
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Water Quantity
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Rehabilitation and Post-Closure
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Tailings Management
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Safety of Communities
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Community Grievances
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Safety and Health of Workers
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Women Workers
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Workplace Deaths and Injuries
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Training of Workers
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Decent Living Wage
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Worker Grievances
(score /4)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Mine Site Score
(%)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

Operational mine sites

Mine Site NameAliases/Other namesCountryCompany's share (%)ProductsMining types
Achinsk AluminaKiya-Shaltyr, MazoulRussian Federation100AluminaOpen-pit
BanicheskyGlukhovskyUkraine100SiliconOpen-pit
Bogatyr*-Kazakhstan50CoalOpen-pit
Dian-Dian-Guinea100BauxiteOpen-pit
Kindia-Guinea100BauxiteOpen-pit
North UralsSeverouralskRussian Federation100BauxiteUnderground
TimanUkhta, Verkhne-ShugoskoeRussian Federation100BauxiteOpen-pit
WindalcoKirkvine, EwartonJamaica100BauxiteOpen-pit
*not included in RMI assessment

Closed mine sites (known)
(controlled assets under care & maintenance, closure or post-closure management)

Mine Site NameAliases/Other namesCountryCompany's share (%)ProductsMining typesYear of closure
Boksitogorsk-Russian Federation100BauxiteOpen-pit1997
Friguia-Guinea100BauxiteOpen-pit2012
ItuniBauxite Company of Guyana Inc.Guyana90BauxiteOpen-pit2021
Kurubuka-22Aroaima, Bauxite Company of Guyana Inc.Guyana90BauxiteOpen-pit2020
KwakwaniBauxite Company of Guyana Inc.Guyana90BauxiteOpen-pit2020

Tax Jurisdictions (known)

Armenia

Australia

British Virgin Islands

China

Cyprus

Guinea

Guyana

Ireland

Italy

Jamaica

Jersey

Kazakhstan

Netherlands

Russian Federation

Sweden

Switzerland

USA

Ukraine